Class 3 – Deception

Resources

Important

  • Types of false confessions – Includes voluntary, coerced-compliant, and coerced-internalized confessions, each with distinct psychological motivations.
  • Length of interrogation – Serves as a key risk indicator for identifying false confessions, as prolonged interrogations significantly increase the probability of a false confession.
  • Juvenile false confession motivations – Youth tend to falsely confess because they fail to consider the long-term consequences, believe they will get to go home immediately, or assume they will receive a less harsh sentence by cooperating.
  • Organized-disorganized model foundations – This classification system was specifically based on and developed from the study of serial sexual murderers, not general homicides.
  • Deductive vs. inductive profiling – Deductive profiling relies strictly on evidence at a specific crime scene to infer traits, while inductive profiling compares the crime to known statistics and demographics of similar past offenders.
  • Geographic profiling’s first step – The initial action a geographic profiler must take is drawing a circle (or perimeter) around all the known crime locations.
  • Marauder versus commuter behavior – Represents a distinction in spatial behavior where some offenders operate outward from a central home base (marauders) while others travel from outside into a separate target area (commuters).
  • Types of polygraph tests – The two main formats used in deception detection are the Comparison Question Test (CQT) and the Concealed Information Test (CIT).
  • Relevant versus comparison questions – In a CQT, relevant questions deal with specific crime details, while comparison questions focus on past problematic or unethical behaviors designed to induce stress.
  • Interpreting CQT readings – A high physiological reaction or “spike” on a relevant question compared to a comparison question suggests deceptive behavior regarding the crime.

Core Concepts

  • False Confessions: A confession given for a crime that the individual did not commit, which accounts for a significant portion of wrongful convictions.
  • Polygraph: A device used to record an individual’s autonomic nervous system responses—specifically heart rate, respiration, and skin conductance—to infer deception.
  • Comparison Question Test (CQT): The most commonly used polygraph method that compares physiological responses to crime-relevant questions against probable-lie comparison questions.
  • Concealed Information Test (CIT): A polygraph test utilizing multiple-choice questions to determine if a suspect possesses specific “guilty knowledge” about crime details.
  • Countermeasures: Physical techniques (e.g., pressing toes to the floor) or mental strategies (e.g., counting backward) deliberately used by suspects to distort polygraph readings and conceal guilt.
  • Brain-Based Deception Detection: Advanced technological methods, including Event-Related Brain Potentials (ERPs like the P300) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), used to measure neural activity associated with lying or recognizing concealed information.
  • Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Lying: Valid indicators of deception include a higher voice pitch, a slower speech rate, and providing fewer details, whereas stereotypic cues like gaze aversion and fidgeting are generally unreliable.
  • Truth-Bias: The pervasive psychological tendency for people to judge more messages as truthful than deceptive, contributing to poor deception detection accuracy.
  • Malingering: The intentional production or exaggeration of psychological or physical symptoms motivated by external incentives, such as avoiding legal consequences or gaining financial payouts.
  • Factitious Disorder: A disorder involving the intentional fabrication of symptoms primarily for the internal psychological motivation of assuming the “sick role”.
  • Conversion Disorder: A condition where neurological or physical symptoms manifest unintentionally and unconsciously without external incentives.
  • Criminal Profiling: An investigative technique aimed at predicting the personality, behavioral, and demographic characteristics of an unknown offender based on evidence left at the crime scenes.
  • Geographic Profiling: A spatial analysis technique that uses the locations of a connected series of crimes to predict the most probable geographic area where the offender resides.

Theories and Frameworks

  • Adaptational Model of Malingering: A theory proposing that malingering occurs as a rational coping strategy when an individual faces a perceived adversarial context, high personal stakes, and no other viable alternatives.
  • Pathogenic Model of Malingering: A theory suggesting that malingering is the result of an underlying mental disorder, where the patient creates bogus symptoms to gain control over their pathology.
  • Criminological Model of Malingering: A model theorizing that antisocial individuals feign symptoms specifically to avoid legal consequences.
  • Organized-Disorganized Model: A profiling typology developed by the FBI that categorizes crime scenes and corresponding offender backgrounds into organized (planned, methodical) or disorganized (impulsive, chaotic) types.
  • Investigative Psychology: An empirical framework developed to replace subjective profiling with a scientific approach based on environmental psychology and rigorous statistical linkage of crime scene behaviors to offender characteristics.
  • Circle Hypothesis: A geographic profiling concept proposing that an offender’s home base is likely located within a circle whose diameter is defined by the two farthest crimes in a series.
  • Distance Decay Hypothesis: A geographic principle stating that the probability of an offender committing a crime decreases the further away they travel from their home.

Notable Individuals

  • William Marston: Created the first polygraph technique measuring blood pressure and created the Wonder Woman comic book character.
  • John Larson: Developed an early version of the polygraph that measured heart rate, respiration, and skin conductivity, which was successfully used in court.
  • David Lykken: Developed the Concealed Information Test (CIT), originally known as the guilty knowledge test.
  • Paul Ekman: Conducted foundational research on detecting deception through the analysis of microexpressions and other nonverbal behaviors.
  • Leanne ten Brinke: Researched the behavioral consequences and facial expressions associated with high-stakes interpersonal deception.
  • David Canter: Founded the field of investigative psychology and advanced the scientific rigor of criminal profiling.
  • James Brussel: A psychiatrist who constructed a highly accurate and famous profile of the “Mad Bomber” in New York City.
  • John Douglas: A key figure in the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit who helped institutionalize modern criminal profiling.